By Lubasi
[wide]
[/wide]
Almost all ordinary people with origins in Western Province and those living in outside the province are rejecting the recent Barotseland resolution. How did the royals arrive at such a resolution? 90 percent of people in western province opposing BRE resolution.
As person from the province; I did not hear any local consultation about decision. I visit my home village outside Mongu, and I talk to my relatives living in the province, no one was consulted. So, “is BRE secede resolution a reflection of the people of western province?
The firstly, there are other tribes in the province beyond the Lozi. We have Nkoyas, Luvales, Nyengo, Chokwe and Mbundas. These tribes are not supporting this resolution to secede from Zambia. Yes, the Nkoya Royal Establishment decision as reported, reject BRE resolution and it the view which majority of the people in Western Province support. Word of mouth poll has about 90 percent of people in western province opposing BRE resolution.
Instead of putting pressure on PF MPs and Government to deliver on the campaign promises to bring development to the province and create opportunities to all people in the province; now all the energy will spent on a cause which is not supported by majority of the people. If BRE resolution called for new colleges, better roads and more better equipped hospitals in the province; everyone in Zambia would be supporting them today.
Legally, after 47 years of sealed agreement, the Royal establishment cannot abandon that agreement which they signed and agreed to follow. The agreement was to form one country between Northern Rhodesia and Barotseland. Action to secede was not part of the original agreement, therefore for the Royal establishment to start calling for “secede” breaks the terms of the BRE agreement. The only option stated in the agreement if issues or concerns arise in the agreement is to approach the Highest Court of Republic of Zambia. This means that the BRE will actually be in default if it continues to call to secede.
BRE must honour the agreement, which it legally signed just before Independence Day in 1964. The bottom line is the BRE agreement is valid and legal, and must be honoured by all signatories which the Royal Establishment and Northern Rhodesia (Republic of Zambia).
Today, people in the Western province enjoy the right to vote for elected leaders in Government of Zambia. So far, Barotseland agreement wants to take away that right. If secede, people would not be allowed to vote for leaders because royal families are not elected and would assignment themselves government positions in the new government for life. This is about royal families, not ordinary people living in the province.
Third, charity begins at home. With all due respect to the BRE, which development project can the Royals point to as having built for the people in Western Province in the last 47 years? Who built clinics or schools in the province? With all due respect, it will be a difficult task for BRE to take the role to build the province. Where do all the millions of Kwacha raised from the Annual Kuomboka ceremony go? Who benefits from this ceremony?
BRE resolution is not about ordinary people. The same families who have benefited from deals with past government want to increase their riches by holding all powers in the province.
Western province has other challenging issues. We need more colleges, better hospitals and build roads to connect peoples and markets. This Barotseland resolution is a total and big distraction from real issues of development. There is an opportunity now especially with the new Government, which has shown great interest in developing the province.
The entire country of Zambia should not be dragged into royal family secession problems. Let the royal families deal with their own issues. The people of western province are Zambians and will continue to belong to Zambia. The province has produced Ministers and MPs who held strategic cabinet positions in education, health and Agriculture, even a highest position as Speaker of Parliament. But these people forgot the province once elected and continue to stay in Lusaka. So, let’s blame those people for failing the deliver development.
I am proud to be a Zambian Lozi, married to a beautiful Mabwe-Tonga woman, living and working in Lamba land.











Dear Mr Lubiso
I would like to applause your effort to try and bridge a gap between Barotse Kingdom and Zambia.
First of all I would like to point out that the call for an independent Barotse has been ongoing for nearly four decades stemming from the actions by the former President Kaunda. It has not been on the forefront in the press or in national discussions over this period of time because it had been suppressed by previous Governments, even today people fear speaking on the issue however people are now fed up of being fearful, have become aware of their rights and are thirsty for emancipation. I am a Barotse national and I have been calling for self-determination and so the notion that the BNC and BRE are acting alone for their self-interests only underscores how much miss- information has been absorbed. Let’s keep in mind that “Lozi” actually comes from our German missionary friends so we must look beyond the scope of “Britain” when we look at historical notes.
Furthermore Barotse is a nation, that is to say it includes and embraces other tribes and races and therefore the call for an independent Barotse is not for the determination of “one” tribe but the peoples of this nation.
There has been no benefit to Borotseland staying with Zambia. To continue on as it was prior to March 27 2012 would simply mean that the Zambian Government would have to plough extensive resources in the region at the expense of the Zambian people while trying to appease those who are determined to be self-Governed. Clearly this is counterproductive and if we are not careful in the way we discuss these issues and allow things to go out of control we will all lose and Zambia stands to lose the most by way investor confidence and the support of its current infrastructure and economy.
As far as other areas of Zambia being underdeveloped Barostse is the least developed of them all and there is a direct correlation of the underdevelopment of Barotseland the abrogation of the BA1964 Agreement and this sets the other areas apart in the case of development. It is up to the Zambian Government to resolve those disparities in those areas as it is now up to the Barotse Nation to begin to solve its own problems.
I really don’t see any reason for Zambia to use coercion on this issue. It will be in the interest of both Zambia and Baroste to work as two independent partners setting yet another historical benchmark in diplomacy and democracy within the continent and beyond.
MRA